Mannik Dhillon, Victory Capital
The Value ETF That Kept Pace With Growth — Without Owning a Single Mag Seven Name
Mannik Dhillon spent the first part of his career grading other people's asset management firms. Eight years at Hewitt, now Aon, building defined contribution plan lineups and then in dedicated manager research, followed by head of manager research at Wilshire Associates. Atlanta to Chicago to Santa Monica, sitting across from CEOs and CIOs on due diligence trips, reviewing what he puts at thousands of business models. When somebody with that resume finally picks a firm to join, the structure of the firm is the tell.
Why He Picked a Multi-Boutique
What he liked as a consultant was the boutique. A small shop focused on one corner of the market, where specialization turns into expertise and expertise eventually shows up in results. What he could not get comfortable with was everything else about a small shop. Operational and compliance due diligence get hard, and after 2008 that stopped being a checkbox item, because boutiques that were good at investing went out of business anyway once the market fell far enough.
Victory Capital became independent of Key Bank in 2013, and the model it built answers that tension. Independent investment teams, which the firm calls franchises, run their own process autonomously, while distribution, marketing, operations, trading and compliance get handled underneath them. Mannik's line for that support layer is that it is centralized but not standardized, bending to what each franchise wants instead of forcing a house process on all of them. The part most firms would bury, he volunteers: Victory's strategies overlap, two franchises can run the same asset class, and he says they embrace it, because different teams running different processes produce a different path even when the mandate matches.
Not Really a Free Cash Flow Product
The fund at the center of the conversation is the VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF, launched in June 2023 and tracking the Victory US Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. Mannik's framing of it is the most useful thing in the episode. This is not really a free cash flow product. It is a better way to measure value, and it sits squarely in large value, which is where advisors actually use it.
His case against the traditional metrics is about what companies have become. Price to book was built for a world of tangible assets sitting on a balance sheet, and that is not the economy anymore. It is IP, intangibles, future growth options. Technology is the obvious example, where the worth of the business has close to nothing to do with buildings and widgets. Free cash flow is the money left after a company pays its bills, which makes it a cleaner read on whether the business generates cash at all, and it sidesteps much of the noise in income statements and balance sheets.
Two Changes to the Screen
Free cash flow yield as a screen was not new when they launched, and he says so plainly. The question he put to his solutions team was what they would do to make it better. The first answer is that the standard approach looks only backward. Trailing free cash flow tells you what a business did, and his objection is that businesses now change faster than that number updates. So the index brings forward estimates of free cash flow in alongside the history, which is how it catches a company at a point of inflection. His example is Moderna during COVID. Flush with cash on vaccine demand, then a cash flow profile that turned over quickly. A rearview screen misses the turn in both directions.
The second is the growth filter, and the way he describes it is the part worth keeping. It is not there to find the best growing companies. It removes the worst growers. A high free cash flow yield can mean a disciplined business trading cheap, or it can mean a yield that looks attractive because the price is falling for a reason and will keep falling. Cutting the tail of companies circling the drain on growth is how you avoid backing into the second one. He is direct that this does not push the fund into growth territory. It removes an anchor, nothing more.
That filter is also what changes the behavior of the whole strategy. Value strategies built on the old metrics tend to do fine in value environments and then give it all back when growth leads. Cutting the worst growers is what keeps a value strategy in the game through a growth run instead of surrendering the ground it gained, and the strategy completed its first three years in exactly that kind of tape. The detail he returns to is that the portfolio has carried no Magnificent Seven exposure. His assumption is that most client books already hold a good bit of it, through index beta or an active large growth manager or both, so a value sleeve that does not depend on the same handful of names lands differently than a generic value pitch does.
Built to Travel
The suite now covers large value, large growth, small cap, international value and international growth, with small growth in research. That was not opportunism after the fact. A requirement Mannik carried over from his consulting years is that a rules based methodology cannot work in only one corner of the market, so before the first product launched, the solutions team had to convince him the process held up across market caps, styles and geographies. When clients started asking about international versions, the work was already sitting there. What is under research now reads like a list of client requests: enhanced income variations, since a high free cash flow yield does not automatically produce a high dividend, and a more sector complete version, because the flagship methodology leaves out financials and REITs on the reasoning that free cash flow is a poor measure for a financial. He names that tradeoff honestly. Concentration is the point when you have conviction in a process, though some clients would rather own the whole sector map.
On what is driving adoption beyond results, his first answer is that people already understand free cash flow. Nobody needs the concept explained, and the methodology is a variation on something familiar rather than a black box. He has a standing rule for the quantitative team on this. You do not have to be complex to drive outcomes, and quantitative investors get stuck building things they cannot explain themselves.
Where He Says It Belongs
On placement he concedes that every portfolio needs beta, and cheap beta with little tracking error is a reasonable thing to own. What he points at is the problem sitting inside it. An S&P 500 allocation next to a Nasdaq 100 allocation has been the same stocks for long stretches, which means doubling up on the largest names rather than diversifying away from them. Keep the low cost beta in the center, he says, and build the wings out of something that behaves differently. Advisors have been pairing the value version with the growth version from the same framework, which gets them both wings off one methodology.
Key Takeaways
- Mannik came to Victory Capital from the manager research side and picked it for its structure: independent franchises running their own process on a platform he calls centralized but not standardized, with strategy overlap between them treated as a feature.
- The flagship strategy is better understood as a value product than a free cash flow product. Price to book lost its power in an economy built on IP and intangibles instead of assets on a balance sheet.
- Two enhancements separate it from a standard free cash flow yield screen: forward estimates alongside trailing figures, so the index catches inflection points, and a growth filter that removes the worst growers to stay out of value traps.
- That filter is why a value strategy can keep pace when growth leads. The portfolio has held no Magnificent Seven exposure, which is the diversification argument for a book already full of mega cap beta.
- The framework had to work across market caps, styles and geographies before anything launched, which is why the international and small cap versions existed on paper before clients asked. On placement, low cost beta stays in the center and the value and growth versions become the wings.
Listen to the full conversation on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or YouTube.
Full Transcript
4,763 wordsMachine transcribed from Brad Roth's conversation with Mannik Dhillon, Victory Capital, with speakers identified automatically. Timestamps link to that moment on YouTube. Lightly cleaned, otherwise unedited.
Welcome to Behind the Ticker, the podcast where we go beyond the symbol and into the strategy. I'm Brad Roth, founder and chief investment officer at Thor Funds. And in each episode, I sit down with ETF managers, CIOs, and industry leaders to break down how these funds are actually built, how they behave in real markets, and how advisors use them in real portfolios. Most people just see a ticker symbol, but we know much more goes on behind the ticker.
Hey, Monik, welcome to the show. Hey, thank you for having me.
So why don't you give everybody a bit about your background? You're a BBA in finance from the University of Georgia. You joined Victory back in 2015. Today, you're president of investment franchises and solutions and head of ETFs. So can you walk us kind of through how that whole journey unfolded?
Sure. Well, as you mentioned, I did go to the University of Georgia, and that's where I got my finance degree. I originally started out as pre-med. Growing up, you don't really hear about roles like we have in asset management, right? You hear about maybe nowadays, you might hear about hedge funds and things like that. But normally, I don't think anybody even knows the role exists. So you ask a little kid, do you want to be when you grow up? You want to say, hey, I want to run an ETF business, right? They probably just don't know about it. So I did that at first pre-med, but I always had this knack for financial markets. I was always... And I started trading some stocks in college, right around the tech kind of boom. And I knew that, okay, that was a better path for me.
Read the full transcript (48 more sections)Collapse transcript
So I switched to finance, and I loved it and came out. And my first job coming out was with a firm called Hewitt. They're now Aon. And it was working with their defined contribution clients and building their plans and lineups and things like that. So on the consulting side, did that for, I was with them for eight, nine years, eventually moving into dedicated manager research. So that's where I started the point of my career where my job was to evaluate asset managers like Victory Capital and recommend their strategies to our clients. So that was a great experience. I took that to Wilshire Associates where I was head of manager research, moved from... So eventually, I went from Atlanta to Chicago, then now to Santa Monica. And again, got to meet with the best of the
Best in the industry. I think it was a really great role to learn the business of asset management. It gave me access to some of the most senior people, CEOs, CIOs, CEOs of firms across the globe. I visited different parts of the world doing manager due diligence on site. And so it was a really great learning experience. And it really helped me figure out kind of what I wanted to do or in my next phase role and kind of what that company should look like. So because I had the opportunity now to see thousands and thousands of different business models. So then when I came across, Victory was known to me because we used to use them in some of our multi-manager funds at Wilshire.
So I knew the folks at Victory. We worked on a couple of projects together. And then the conversation really began around, the model that Victory was building in its private state. So the, Victory Capital became independent of KeyBank back in 2013. Actually, on the 31st was 13 year anniversary of that. And the idea was create a new version of asset management where you can find the best and skilled managers with edge and, but leave them alone to do what they do best, which is manage money. in asset management, one of the things I learned in the research side is especially smaller boutiques, the investors are dealing with other things, like they're dealing with HR and accounting and all this other stuff. And, and, you know,
It does take time away. And then if you have these large firms that are built off of one research process, you kind of get groupthink across the portfolios, right? So this way we, we have independent autonomous investment boutiques that we call franchises that operate their process and manager teams independently and autonomous. And I'm there to help them be a best practice kind of provider, be counsel where they need, but really it's up to them to drive their process and team. And then we support them with everything else. So they don't have to, worry about managing a distribution team or marketing or, what are compliance best practices. And so that was a model that resonated with me. And that's why I decided to take on at the time, what was the head
Of product role at Victory Capital. And that's now grown obviously since then. And, and part of that growth has come, to other areas like overseeing the investor franchises to the solutions business to also the ETFs. Great. So before we like get a little bit deeper into the product lineup
And the ETFs we're going to talk about today, I ask everybody this, when you're not behind the desk, what do you do outside of work? Any hobbies? Yeah. When I have time for hobbies, right? I mean,
That's the other thing. So we have, yeah, it's about outside of work. I try to spend as much time as I can with my family. we all here at Victory work hard. We travel a lot. So when, when I'm actually in town or, on the weekends, I like to spend time with them catching up. And, there's, there's a lot of, and now as they're turning into teenagers, there's a lot of kind of hopefully dad moments where I can provide some knowledge and insight to them. Um, uh, and so like doing all kinds of things with them. Um, I, I used to play golf, but don't have the time anymore. Um, I like cars, uh, things like that, but you know,
No specific hobby that I would say, Hey, I do this every day or every week regularly other than,
Uh, try to spend time with my family. Yeah. It seems to be the, uh, growing theme. Uh, everybody's just trying to, everybody's so busy anymore, just try to spend time with the family, but let's talk about Victory Capital. You touched on this, but I think it's super unique because I've talked to over probably a hundred firms now and you were running like this multi boutique model with independent investment franchises. I know you touched on it, but can
You just go into that a little bit more? Cause it is super unique. Right. So, going back to like when I was evaluating managers for institutional clients, we always liked the boutique, um, structure where it was a small firm. They focused on a few things in one corner of the market. Right. And we, we felt that, okay, that leads to specialization. It leads to a level of expertise that should drive performance over time. Um, but what we didn't like as institutional consultants is small firms don't have the infrastructure, right? The operational due diligence gets stuff difficult. The compliance due diligence gets difficult. And so, uh, particularly post 08, that became very important to clients because some of those smaller boutiques that were, you know,
Good at what they were doing went out of business because, the market declined so significantly, right? They just, they just couldn't survive. So, um, but I, I truly believe in, and we believe in that if you find those managers that are good at what they do, um, they've exhibited skill, have an edge, um, you can keep them, um, isolated from the noise of everything else that goes along with asset management and let them focus on generating returns for clients and servicing their clients. And that's kind of what we've done so that the other benefit of it is if somebody comes to victory capital to buy investment product from us, from either multiple franchises or the solutions team, they're not getting the same process at all. So in fact, like we get asked this a lot of times around, Hey, do you
Have overlap then of your strategies and products? And we do. And, we actually embrace it because even in the same asset class, different processes, different teams lead to different results, or at least the path is very different. And so we basically allows the clients to have the choice of which approach they want. And we have many clients that own multiple products from victory capital from multiple franchises because of that. Um, so I think that's, but then you need to support those franchises with all of the other things that are very important to clients. Um, you have to be able to go out and tell the story through your sales team. You have to be able to mark, create marketing collateral. You have to be able to run and operate the business in terms of
Operations, trading, all those things that go along with it. And so, uh, that's how we put that layer below the franchises to support them. Um, our model, our, our, our centralized platform, while it's centralized, it's not standardized. So we're very customized in how we work with our franchises. Some like things a certain way, some need certain help on certain things more than others. And so it's very customized, uh, not standardized platform off which they can kind of grow their businesses.
So why don't we get into Vflow, VFLO, the Victory Shares Free Cashflow ETF. You guys launched this June of 2023. Um, it, it tracks your Victory US Large Cap Free Cashflow Index at a high level. What is this fund and what problem is it trying to solve for investors?
Yeah. So the, the way we came out with this fund, we recognize that free cashflow had, um, gathered acceptance in the industry from a, as a value metric, right? And, and we think as a better value metric. And so you'd seen a lot of assets go into some of the other products that are out there in the marketplace that follow a free cashflow yield approach. Um, but we also like when we were sitting down and looking at that realized, and this is a function of all the active quantitative work the solutions team does, that there are better ways to go about capturing that free cashflow yield or measuring it. And then also adjustments you can make to your portfolio, your list of securities
That avoid certain things like the value trap that you sometimes run into with value investing. So Vflow sits squarely in the large value space. That's how clients are using it. That's where it fits. Um, but it's a better way of measuring value than some of your traditional price to book price to earning type approaches. Um, and then along the way, whenever we've come out with a new rules-based product, that we have to, we have to say, what are we doing to make it better? So you identify a challenge or maybe I don't want to say a deficiency, but like something that can be improved upon and then say, how can we then make this better? So that the clients ultimately, it's about the risk adjusted outcome that they get and, um, how can we improve upon it?
So that's really how Vflow came about. Uh, we said, Hey, free cashflow yield is a great measure. There's a better way to do it. Um, and then we launched our product just over three years ago.
Well, why don't we get into the index methodology just a little bit more. So you're not just ranking stocks by free cashflow yield. You've also layered in this, growth expectations as well.
So how does that combination actually work? Sure. So a couple of the enhancements we made, um, and you hit, you hit on one of them for, um, so the first thing was, the products that existed out in the marketplace when they were measuring free cashflow yield or they still are, um, they look in the rear view mirror only. Um, and while history is a good indicator with how dynamic markets are and how quickly business, um, businesses are changing, we felt, uh, a free cashflow yield approach that looks in the rear view mirror only can be improved by also incorporating forward estimates of free cashflow so that you can catch points of inflection in a business. Take, very simple example is during COVID, um, Moderna, um, during
That time, um, they were flush with cash because of, of all the vaccines and then quickly their free cashflow profile turned around and, with a rear view looking approach, you would have missed that. And so having that as one enhancement that, um, has really helped with results. And the second is the one you were touching on, which is the growth filter really. So it's less about finding the best growing companies. It's about getting rid of the worst growers. So we don't end up accidentally in a value trap. And, uh, what that's done is really allowed the strategy, the index and the fund to outperform in what's been a really growth kind of headwind for value managers, right. And value strategies. And, um, interestingly enough, when it completed its
First three years, being able to outperform not only your style benchmark in the value space, but also core and growth benchmarks over that period of time and doing it without any mag seven, like that's a pretty compelling, I think, uh, solution for clients.
Yeah, I would agree. Um, and we'll talk about, we'll touch base on that growth here in a second, but I was looking through the holdings. I know you're not allowed to talk about specific tickers, but I was curious, like, why does some names screen well on free cashflow framework when they
Might not on like that classic value metric? Yeah. Well, there's, there's a couple of ways too, right? So oftentimes there's some similarities, right? You'll look at a price to book a based approach and it'll lead you to the same place that free cashflow yield will. Um, the difference though is, one price to book fails to capture some of the evolution that companies have gone through in the marketplace, right? So now you're having companies, it's not about tangible assets on the books anymore. These are, there's a lot of IP, there's an intangibles, there's future growth, uh, opportunities. So there's a lot more that goes into determining what is a good company for the long run than just the assets they have in their book and what price
You're paying for them. Right. So given technology is a perfect example, right? It's not about, um, brick and mortar buildings and widgets, it's about way more than that. And so free cashflow is a better measure in that regard. And that leads to some of those differences you see between a standard price to book approach and maybe a free cashflow yield, uh, approach. The other thing is, um, the growth filter does matter. And so what you'll see is, well, free cashflow is great because it's the money that's left over after companies pay this bills, right? So it is a true pure representation, um, of a company's ability to generate, um, returns for clients really in, or cash, right? In this case.
And it removes a lot of the, um, other noise that happens in the accounting of income statements and balance sheets and things like that. So it's very pure in our regard. And then when you take that, you can say, okay, well, I found a company with a great free cashflow yield, so it must be great. The problem is maybe that yield is, uh, really attractive because there's something wrong with the company that, um, is going to not only persist, but maybe even get worse, right? So you want to attract a free cashflow yield, but you don't want it. You don't necessarily want the yield to necessarily go higher just because your price is declining, right? So in that case, what we found is just get rid of the worst growers, that, that tail that where these companies are not
Exhibiting growth. So then you can say, okay, not only are you generating a lot of free cashflow, you have a very disciplined way of managing your business, but you also have, you're not in, in, in that trap or in that kind of circling the drain around growth. Um, so that leads to how these companies do. And so what happens every quarter when we rebalance, you'll see a healthy number of changes, companies are being dropped, companies are being added because free cashflow yield changes over the quarter, but plus so does growth prospects. And, um, so we,
Try to capture both of them in a rebalance. Interesting. But you touched on this, a little bit, the results have been remarkable, right? Vflow has grown to roughly six to 9 billion in assets in three years. that puts it in kind of one of the top tiers of ETF launches, this decade, um, outside of performance, um, which as you, as you've mentioned has been, has been incredible. What do you think is also driving adoption, uh, of this type of product?
Well, one, it's an easy to understand process. Um, free cashflow is not something we have to go really explain to people. It's understood. Uh, we're just capturing it in a different way than some of our peers. Um, so I think from, uh, an ability to understand the methodology, it's not that hard, right? So anytime we set out to do a rules-based product, um, out of the solutions team of victory, it's been, it, there is one, um, belief we have, which is you don't have to be overly complex to drive outcomes. And so sometimes I think, especially quantitative investors can get stuck in the, creating this black box that even maybe sometimes they can't even explain how it works. And so we kept it simple. So the simple
Story helps in conveying the value proposition for the product, right? So there's not a lot of, uh, uh, hoops to jump through for the, for the buyer to understand how it works. Um, so that's definitely one. Second is we have a fantastic sales team. Our intermediary sales team, uh, is well-resourced, well-experienced, has great relationships in the market. Um, we have a dedicated RIA sales team and with any new ETF launch, that's an important channel in the retail space. Um, so they're out there doing that, but we've spent so much time educating and training them before they're going out into the field that that helps. So we have basically subject matter experts in their own regard, have the confidence to go into their relationship and talk to them how this
Can benefit them. Um, a lot of it is also cross sell from other products. Like I mentioned, advisors have other products from victory capital. So they might know us for maybe our global strategy, or maybe they bought another ETF from us before. And we're going in there and telling them about the new approach that's helped. The marketing collateral is also very important. I think we have a, uh, great marketing team at victory capital where, the ability to take what are, um, technical concepts and, and distill them down into a way that, an end client even can understand, I think is very important. So having clear collateral, it's easy to understand and shows the value proposition has been another thing. Um, now you put all that together with obviously now
Great, a real, uh, three year live record, five-star rating. Um, I think, the adoption is only going to, uh, be better from here.
Yeah. Um, the, the landscape in this area is, is also like pretty competitive. We've had a competitor of yours, um, on the show. They've, they have a huge following. They've had the CTF out since like 2016. What is, what are you guys doing differently as you think about like this particular competitive landscape? Is it the growth filter? Like, is that, is that, is that the differentiation between this product and maybe some of the other large ones that are in the space?
Yeah. It's that and that forward looking on the free cashflow. So being able to not, um, only focus on historical results, but looking at forward free cashflow estimates is very important. That's been a driver of performance and outperformance. Uh, but you also said it, the growth filter is one point of differentiation. And I think it's important to know that doesn't push the fund into growth territory. It's just basically trying to say, you don't want that anchor or drag from these, um, companies that truly are cheap for a reason.
So you guys have built a whole suite around this idea, right? You have V flow and large cap, you have SFLO and small cap and GFLW and large cap growth. So can you talk about like that philosophy and extending the same framework across different market caps and styles? And are we going to see more variations of this particular idea from victory and maybe other styles as we look forward?
Yeah, absolutely. Um, we also have IFLO and GRIN, which are the international versions of it too, because, and those really came about because clients had asked us, Hey, have you thought about it? And, honestly, the answer was yes, we thought about it. We, from when we did the R and D for the original product, maybe it's coming from my institutional consulting days, but one of the requirements that I have when I sit down with a quantitative team, and in this case, the solutions team building rules-based products is look, you can't come to me with a methodology that only works in one corner of the market. If it's a sound rules-based methodology, it should work across asset classes. And that was one of the first things that the team had to
Convince me of that we could apply our process across market caps, styles, and geographies. And it, and it did work, in our research. And so we were, when, when those clients started asking about international, it's one of those, Hey, glad you asked. Like we actually have already done the work. We know the approach can work. And so we launched those products. So now we have a pretty healthy suite, you have large value of large growth, you have small cap, we're doing some research around small growth, if what, what can be done there. And then we have international value, international growth. So we got the right building blocks going for the flagship free cashflow approach. I think what you'll see down the road is there's a lot of
Opportunities for us to augment or, and what we do for different types of client needs, right? So for example, is there a way to enhance the income because, free cashflow yield isn't necessarily about dividend income. Now companies that generate high free cashflow can pay dividends, but it's not, your high yielding dividend type story necessarily. Is there a way to augment maybe the securities underneath with maybe derivatives based income or something like that? one of the things in the flagship methodology we don't include financials and rates. And it's a very good reason because free cashflow is not a good measure for financials. That's another area where, we've had some clients ask us, would we be willing to do one that's maybe a little more core like,
Or maybe more complete from a sector perspective. Obviously, our research shows that, when you have conviction in a process and a methodology, just like active fundamental managers, you want to build a concentrated portfolio. And, as long as you can compensate for the risk you're taking, that's a great product. But, some clients feel that, maybe having financials and stuff is better, but it's, it's been a big, it's something that, we, we've looked at, but, it's, I, and it, it's always going to be, I think, an easy enough to understand concepts. So where it does have opportunities to add offshoots from it in the future. Another one we got asked about is running it as a global strategy,
Which obviously we would be able to do because we have, the, the geographic capabilities already out there.
So if you're, an advisor thinking about vflow, like how should they use this in their portfolio? Is this a value sleeve? Is it a core replacement? Like where would you advise somebody with an already diversified model portfolio to put this?
Sure. Look, I recognize that every portfolio is going to need beta. You're going to have that beta, right? You get a little bit of beta, low cost beta. You don't, you're taking a lot of tracking error. You're taking no tracking error. So we understand that, but that comes with, other challenges. So for example, you could have an S&P 500 allocation today and a Nasdaq 100 allocation. And actually, for a long period of time, you were probably in the same stocks and you were probably doubling down on some of those larger stocks. So whether it's, something on the growth side, like the Nasdaq 100 or Russell 1000 growth, or it's in the core space, like the S&P 500, we've seen the issues with concentration that have existed.
So the concept of, we can give you a product that can still outperform. Now, here's the important thing about, where how the growth filter and everything works together is, generally value strategies using the old metrics, they do well in value environments. The problem has been, they give it all back in a growth environment. And, and that's where, the, the growth filter, just getting rid of the worst growers comes into play because what it's actually allowed Vflow to do is not only do well in those value oriented markets, but keep pace in growth led markets. And what that means for a client is they can still get their growth out of, let's say a Nasdaq 100 or an S&P 500 type S&P 500 is blend, but a lot of it's growthy, so it's like,
They just change, it just changes where the style marker comes in, but, they can look to diversify away. So for example, I mentioned earlier, Vflow has produced the track record it has with no mag seven exposure. Right. And I bet you most portfolios somewhere in there have a good bit of mag seven exposure, just either through index beta investing, or maybe even active large growth. So what we've seen is, it gives people comfort to be able to say, look, I understand even though values underperform for so long, okay, I can see how this approach won't leave me wishing I hadn't invested in value if growth continues to run. And it's also driving results without some of the same stocks I own in a lot of other places in my portfolio. And then we also have
The growth product. So a lot of clients have actually paired the two together. pairing the value version with the growth version. So Vflow, VFLO with GFLW has been a great pairing for certain clients. And then what they can do is they can keep that center part of their portfolio in low cost beta if they want, and they're getting something very different.
Well, Monik, I really appreciate you spending some time with me today. Before I can let you go, though, where can people learn more about Victory Capital and your entire suite of product?
VCM.com is the best place.
All right. Well, again, thanks for spending some time with me today.
All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
Daily Market Intelligence
The Signal
Brad Roth's daily market brief — systematic signals, ETF positioning, and what the data is actually showing.
Subscribe Free →